<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/phd/reserach-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com</link>
	<description>Lilia Efimova on personal productivity in knowledge-intensive environments, weblog research, knowledge management, PhD, serendipity and lack of work-life balance...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilia Efimova</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/phd/reserach-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-19618</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilia Efimova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?page_id=1964#comment-19618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David, it could make sense to check with your university what are their rules regarding uses of previously published material in a dissertation. In many cases (including my own case), it is not a problem and even encouraged to do so, although you do have to sort out copyright issues between publishers of the papers reused and the dissertation publisher.

As for blogging - it&#039;s a grey area and heavily depends on if you (and your supervisors) are prepared to take risks and to experiment. So far I didn&#039;t have any problem with publishing my own work after parts of it has been blogged. Also, while a paper might be build using blog material it&#039;s never the exactly the same (e.g. as discussed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/07/02/if-most-of-the-things-i-want-to-say-in-my-phd-are-already-in-my-weblog-whats-the-added-value-of-the-dissertation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If most of the things I want to say in my PhD are already in my weblog, what’s the added value of the dissertation?&lt;/a&gt;)

Btw, my blog is not public domain, it&#039;s copyrighted (I should add CC license). I&#039;m looking for the Creative Commons license for the dissertation publishing, will blog on it with more details soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, it could make sense to check with your university what are their rules regarding uses of previously published material in a dissertation. In many cases (including my own case), it is not a problem and even encouraged to do so, although you do have to sort out copyright issues between publishers of the papers reused and the dissertation publisher.</p>
<p>As for blogging &#8211; it&#8217;s a grey area and heavily depends on if you (and your supervisors) are prepared to take risks and to experiment. So far I didn&#8217;t have any problem with publishing my own work after parts of it has been blogged. Also, while a paper might be build using blog material it&#8217;s never the exactly the same (e.g. as discussed in <a href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/07/02/if-most-of-the-things-i-want-to-say-in-my-phd-are-already-in-my-weblog-whats-the-added-value-of-the-dissertation/" rel="nofollow">If most of the things I want to say in my PhD are already in my weblog, what’s the added value of the dissertation?</a>)</p>
<p>Btw, my blog is not public domain, it&#8217;s copyrighted (I should add CC license). I&#8217;m looking for the Creative Commons license for the dissertation publishing, will blog on it with more details soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/phd/reserach-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-19497</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?page_id=1964#comment-19497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to understand the implications of blogging for PhD acceptance. I have been told that if a work has been previously published (eg conference speaking) it may not be then used as PhD material. So how does that work in a Creative Commons environment, and in your case you have placed your whole PhD real time in the public domain. Would be grateful for insight/links to unravel this.

david]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to understand the implications of blogging for PhD acceptance. I have been told that if a work has been previously published (eg conference speaking) it may not be then used as PhD material. So how does that work in a Creative Commons environment, and in your case you have placed your whole PhD real time in the public domain. Would be grateful for insight/links to unravel this.</p>
<p>david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
