<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I killing publication opportunities with blogging PhD results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2009/02/04/am-i-killing-publication-opportunities-with-blogging-phd-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2009/02/04/am-i-killing-publication-opportunities-with-blogging-phd-results/</link>
	<description>Lilia Efimova on personal productivity in knowledge-intensive environments, weblog research, knowledge management, PhD, serendipity and lack of work-life balance...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Amprimo</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2009/02/04/am-i-killing-publication-opportunities-with-blogging-phd-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14814</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Amprimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=2172#comment-14814</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you kill publication opportunities with blogging. From the experience I have in my specific context (France), people who pay attention to your publication activity in terms of ranking do not consider blogging at all. When then know what it is and how to go through the blogosphere, they regard its content as crap.
And that is actually an opportunity for you. 1) you may use blogging to test and strengthen your ideas. 2) you dive into Academic publications by respecting formats and standards (that no blogger would ever follow and very few reader would read).

We have to face reality: Academic publication is only for the few. It&#039;s diffusion is limited and one reason is the format the Academia has set for.

Then there is another element we have to balance: time to publication vs relevance. The Academia and their reviews have amazingly long workflows. It&#039;s almost a selection per se! The time you get through, your work is already out of date. That is a real problem of diffusion of knowledge and innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you kill publication opportunities with blogging. From the experience I have in my specific context (France), people who pay attention to your publication activity in terms of ranking do not consider blogging at all. When then know what it is and how to go through the blogosphere, they regard its content as crap.<br />
And that is actually an opportunity for you. 1) you may use blogging to test and strengthen your ideas. 2) you dive into Academic publications by respecting formats and standards (that no blogger would ever follow and very few reader would read).</p>
<p>We have to face reality: Academic publication is only for the few. It&#8217;s diffusion is limited and one reason is the format the Academia has set for.</p>
<p>Then there is another element we have to balance: time to publication vs relevance. The Academia and their reviews have amazingly long workflows. It&#8217;s almost a selection per se! The time you get through, your work is already out of date. That is a real problem of diffusion of knowledge and innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoush</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2009/02/04/am-i-killing-publication-opportunities-with-blogging-phd-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14587</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=2172#comment-14587</guid>
		<description>If you are planning to publish the dissertation (or a modified version of it) as a book, have a look at VDM Verlag. They publish academic research at no cots to authors http://www.vdm-publishing.com/  I had a book on the basis of my PhD dissertation published by them last year, and was in general saitisfied with the way they handled the whole process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are planning to publish the dissertation (or a modified version of it) as a book, have a look at VDM Verlag. They publish academic research at no cots to authors <a href="http://www.vdm-publishing.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vdm-publishing.com/</a>  I had a book on the basis of my PhD dissertation published by them last year, and was in general saitisfied with the way they handled the whole process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yigal Chamish</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2009/02/04/am-i-killing-publication-opportunities-with-blogging-phd-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14576</link>
		<dc:creator>Yigal Chamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=2172#comment-14576</guid>
		<description>No. (to your question on post title).
I believe that you are only broadening your professional reputation.
You are not willing to publish your Thesis, but its applications and ideas, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. (to your question on post title).<br />
I believe that you are only broadening your professional reputation.<br />
You are not willing to publish your Thesis, but its applications and ideas, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
