<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog networking study: presenting oneself through blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/</link>
	<description>Lilia Efimova on personal productivity in knowledge-intensive environments, weblog research, knowledge management, PhD, serendipity and lack of work-life balance...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eugenb58g (Eugenia Thomas)</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25767</link>
		<dc:creator>eugenb58g (Eugenia Thomas)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-25767</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/eugenb58g&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;eugenb58g (Eugenia Thomas)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;eugenb58g (Eugenia Thomas)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/eugenb58g&quot;/&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Blog networking study: presenting oneself through blogging... [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/eugenb58g" title="Twitter Comment"></p>
<p></a><br />
Blog networking study: presenting oneself through blogging&#8230; [link to post] &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathemagenic &#187; Blog as a nexus of multimembership and accidental brokering</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-10094</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathemagenic &#187; Blog as a nexus of multimembership and accidental brokering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-10094</guid>
		<description>[...] dealing with different audiences that a weblog serves (the results of blog networking study provide examples of both). Blogging in a context of knowledge work requires balancing interests of self and others, peers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dealing with different audiences that a weblog serves (the results of blog networking study provide examples of both). Blogging in a context of knowledge work requires balancing interests of self and others, peers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post Warholism 1 &#124; The Parallax View</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8662</link>
		<dc:creator>Post Warholism 1 &#124; The Parallax View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-8662</guid>
		<description>[...] So what next, do we face endless Devolution? In the next post on this topic I&#8217;ll muse on the possibilities. What I&#8217;m wondering around is the possiblities and identities of a knowing social media, one which has re-established itself, so that we&#8217;re no longer on a journey without blogs, but one where, as Lilia Efimova notes, at least some of the directions have already been recorded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what next, do we face endless Devolution? In the next post on this topic I&#8217;ll muse on the possibilities. What I&#8217;m wondering around is the possiblities and identities of a knowing social media, one which has re-established itself, so that we&#8217;re no longer on a journey without blogs, but one where, as Lilia Efimova notes, at least some of the directions have already been recorded. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilia Efimova</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilia Efimova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-8379</guid>
		<description>Sure, they started using Twitter relatively recently (however, many are early adopters of it). There are  some glimpses of how things changed over time in the interviews, but I didn&#039;t even try to focus on those.

As for Nancy: she doesn&#039;t use her other Twitter account. She has a more private (content-wise) travel blog, but hardly writes there. I also had an opportunity to ask her about her reactions to discovering how others position her blog (re: Jason&#039;s comment), she said it didn&#039;t have any effect on her writing (well, it was something like &quot;I just ignore it&quot; - have to check the audio).

That&#039;s one of the reasons why I really do not feel like talking about blogging in terms of performance - it assumes too much intentionality...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, they started using Twitter relatively recently (however, many are early adopters of it). There are  some glimpses of how things changed over time in the interviews, but I didn&#8217;t even try to focus on those.</p>
<p>As for Nancy: she doesn&#8217;t use her other Twitter account. She has a more private (content-wise) travel blog, but hardly writes there. I also had an opportunity to ask her about her reactions to discovering how others position her blog (re: Jason&#8217;s comment), she said it didn&#8217;t have any effect on her writing (well, it was something like &#8220;I just ignore it&#8221; &#8211; have to check the audio).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons why I really do not feel like talking about blogging in terms of performance &#8211; it assumes too much intentionality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brake</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>This is of course a constantly-changing field of study - I&#039;m guessing that your respondents weren&#039;t twittering until fairly recently (when is the &quot;cut off&quot; when you decide fieldwork is over?). And Nancy (for one) appears to twitter both publicly and privately (using different accounts).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is of course a constantly-changing field of study &#8211; I&#8217;m guessing that your respondents weren&#8217;t twittering until fairly recently (when is the &#8220;cut off&#8221; when you decide fieldwork is over?). And Nancy (for one) appears to twitter both publicly and privately (using different accounts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilia Efimova</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-7512</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilia Efimova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-7512</guid>
		<description>David, just realised that the issue of whether the participants had private blogs is more complicated - most of them are on Twitter that serves many functions of the personal diary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, just realised that the issue of whether the participants had private blogs is more complicated &#8211; most of them are on Twitter that serves many functions of the personal diary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilia Efimova</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilia Efimova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-7230</guid>
		<description>Jason, David, first a bit of clarification - things discussed in this post were not central to the study, but emerged as a theme, so some questions that you ask I can only address as &quot;further research questions&quot;. Also, my knowledge of the (online) identity research is pretty much on the surface...

Now to the specific things:

&lt;strong&gt;On unanticipated audience reactions and how they shape the performance of blogging&lt;/strong&gt;. One of the reasons that I&#039;m a bit concerned about bringing performance/identity management as a frame in this case is that I see blogging as both identity exploration and performance. Also, in a sense, all audience reactions in a case of blogging are somewhat unanticipated and they do shape what happens next. (Just remembered an old blog post on &lt;a href=http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2005/04/21/networked-identity-links-relations-and-control/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;networked identity&lt;/a&gt;). 

Don&#039;t know for sure in Nancy&#039;s case, will see if I can catch her to ask :)

&lt;strong&gt;On personal issues on the weblog&lt;/strong&gt;. I guess I should extend this part to say a bit more. From what I can see most of the reasons of bringing &quot;personal&quot; issues come from the belief in the importance of personal side at work and partly from learning over time that those things are normal, not scary and might be beneficial in a case of blogging (btw, those things were more explicit in the Microsoft study). A couple of participants have more personal weblogs, but those far from the diary-style personal blogging. As for the SNSes - still have to post the part on making choices between tools, there is a bit there.

But in general, I think both of you touch the issue that I should make more explicit  - there seem to be some degree of agreement that getting to know another blogger happens as much &quot;between the lines&quot; as in the text itself, which has implications on how much one can actually &quot;perform&quot; and also on how &quot;personal&quot; a weblog is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, David, first a bit of clarification &#8211; things discussed in this post were not central to the study, but emerged as a theme, so some questions that you ask I can only address as &#8220;further research questions&#8221;. Also, my knowledge of the (online) identity research is pretty much on the surface&#8230;</p>
<p>Now to the specific things:</p>
<p><strong>On unanticipated audience reactions and how they shape the performance of blogging</strong>. One of the reasons that I&#8217;m a bit concerned about bringing performance/identity management as a frame in this case is that I see blogging as both identity exploration and performance. Also, in a sense, all audience reactions in a case of blogging are somewhat unanticipated and they do shape what happens next. (Just remembered an old blog post on <a href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2005/04/21/networked-identity-links-relations-and-control/">networked identity</a>). </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know for sure in Nancy&#8217;s case, will see if I can catch her to ask :)</p>
<p><strong>On personal issues on the weblog</strong>. I guess I should extend this part to say a bit more. From what I can see most of the reasons of bringing &#8220;personal&#8221; issues come from the belief in the importance of personal side at work and partly from learning over time that those things are normal, not scary and might be beneficial in a case of blogging (btw, those things were more explicit in the Microsoft study). A couple of participants have more personal weblogs, but those far from the diary-style personal blogging. As for the SNSes &#8211; still have to post the part on making choices between tools, there is a bit there.</p>
<p>But in general, I think both of you touch the issue that I should make more explicit  &#8211; there seem to be some degree of agreement that getting to know another blogger happens as much &#8220;between the lines&#8221; as in the text itself, which has implications on how much one can actually &#8220;perform&#8221; and also on how &#8220;personal&#8221; a weblog is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brake</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you could dig more into why these people feel they should be sharing personal details on their &quot;public&quot; (work) blogs? Do they consider it something people expect from the blogging medium? Is this &#039;personalisation&#039; of business relationships linked to larger social trends? Do some or all of them have separate private blogs for friends or family? If not, why not? And how does this relate to use of SNSes by your interviewees? (Mind you I am guessing it&#039;s probably too late for you to address this with your interviewees now...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you could dig more into why these people feel they should be sharing personal details on their &#8220;public&#8221; (work) blogs? Do they consider it something people expect from the blogging medium? Is this &#8216;personalisation&#8217; of business relationships linked to larger social trends? Do some or all of them have separate private blogs for friends or family? If not, why not? And how does this relate to use of SNSes by your interviewees? (Mind you I am guessing it&#8217;s probably too late for you to address this with your interviewees now&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Priem</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-7154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Priem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-7154</guid>
		<description>I think that bringing in more Goffman sounds like a wonderful idea; I would also drop some authors like Turkle  in as well.  The issue of identity construction in blogging is a great one to explore, and I think would benefit from a closer inspection of the last decade of work into online identity in general.

I would love to see you expand a bit on how the audience helps guide that identity; you mention how Nancy&#039;s audience has placed her in a role (as Goffman might say) that she&#039;s not entirely comfortable with.  Is this a common occurrence?  To what extent do these unanticipated audience reactions alter the performance of blogging?

You do a good job of looking at how bloggers may filter their identities less in blogging than in other types of discourse; as you suggest, I would bring out Goffman&#039;s concept of &#039;backstage&#039; here: by revealing ideas that aren&#039;t yet fully structured, the blogger is letting the reader into a privileged area.  Goffman&#039;s &#039;masks&#039; might be good to bring up as well.

I&#039;ve been busy working on my rss tagcloud &lt;a href=&quot;http://jasonpriem.com/feedvis&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;project&lt;/a&gt; (your post on using word clouds to compare two texts helped launch that one--thanks), so this is the first of this series that I&#039;ve read; I&#039;m looking forward to going back and checking out the other ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that bringing in more Goffman sounds like a wonderful idea; I would also drop some authors like Turkle  in as well.  The issue of identity construction in blogging is a great one to explore, and I think would benefit from a closer inspection of the last decade of work into online identity in general.</p>
<p>I would love to see you expand a bit on how the audience helps guide that identity; you mention how Nancy&#8217;s audience has placed her in a role (as Goffman might say) that she&#8217;s not entirely comfortable with.  Is this a common occurrence?  To what extent do these unanticipated audience reactions alter the performance of blogging?</p>
<p>You do a good job of looking at how bloggers may filter their identities less in blogging than in other types of discourse; as you suggest, I would bring out Goffman&#8217;s concept of &#8216;backstage&#8217; here: by revealing ideas that aren&#8217;t yet fully structured, the blogger is letting the reader into a privileged area.  Goffman&#8217;s &#8216;masks&#8217; might be good to bring up as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been busy working on my rss tagcloud <a href="http://jasonpriem.com/feedvis">project</a> (your post on using word clouds to compare two texts helped launch that one&#8211;thanks), so this is the first of this series that I&#8217;ve read; I&#8217;m looking forward to going back and checking out the other ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post Warholism 1 &#171; The Garden Shed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/11/26/blog-networking-study-presenting-oneself-through-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-7046</link>
		<dc:creator>Post Warholism 1 &#171; The Garden Shed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mathemagenic.com/?p=1904#comment-7046</guid>
		<description>[...] So what next, do we face endless Devolution? In the next post on this topic I&#8217;ll muse on the possibilities. What I&#8217;m wondering around is the possiblities and identities of a knowing social media, one which has re-established itself, so that we&#8217;re no longer on a journey without blogs, but one where, as Lilia Efimova notes, at least some of the directions have already been recorded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what next, do we face endless Devolution? In the next post on this topic I&#8217;ll muse on the possibilities. What I&#8217;m wondering around is the possiblities and identities of a knowing social media, one which has re-established itself, so that we&#8217;re no longer on a journey without blogs, but one where, as Lilia Efimova notes, at least some of the directions have already been recorded. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

