November 8th 2006 09:06 am
Understanding weblog communities through digital traces: a framework, a tool and an example
Anjo Anjewierden and Lilia Efimova. Understanding weblog communities through digital traces: a framework, a tool and an example. In Proceedings International Workshop on Community Informatics (COMINF 2006), pp. 279-289, Montpellier, 2006 (November). Springer, LNCS 4277.
Abstract. Often research on online communities could be compared to archaeology (Jones, 1997): researchers look at patterns in digital traces that members leave to characterise the community they belong to. Relatively easy access to those traces and a growing number of methods and tools to collect and analyse them make such analysis increasingly attractive. However, a researcher is faced with difficult tasks of choosing which digital artefacts and which relations between them should be taken into account, and how the finding should be interpreted to say something meaningful about the community based on the traces of its members.
In this paper we present a framework that allows categorising digital traces of an online community along five dimensions (people, documents, terms, links and time) and then describe a tool that supports the analysis of community traces by combining several of them, illustrating the types of analysis possible using a dataset from a weblog community.
I should blog it a while ago :)
Anyway, the paper is good to get an idea of what we (Anjo, me, Rogier Brussee and Robert de Hoog) have been doing behind the scenes in respect to understanding and visualising patterns in weblog communities.
For more:
- Anjo’s posts on the workshop and the framework (and lots of other things in the archives)
- my post on artefacts and practices in weblog research
- “research challenges” section in unpublished paper with Stephanie (published version lost some of the discussion relevant to this post)
Hmm, given how many bits and pieces are already there I should write more on it…
Tags: blog communities, blog research, knowledge representations, methodology, papersArchived version of this entry is available at http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2006/11/08.html#a1852; comments are here.
Related posts
No Comments yet »