|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ton in Weaving Webs: How to Quickly Find Somebody's Online Traces?: As I do after each conference I am currently busy finding people on-line and adding them to my 'social filter' after BlogTalk Reloaded. Basically that means finding their on-line presences and adding them to my feedreader, and connecting to them in different environments such as Plazes, Skype, Flickr, OpenBC/Xing, LinkedIn, 43People etc. Weaving them into my social web so to speak. Ton is not alone in that: each f2f meeting I participate in follows with a surge of "let's be friends" requests over many platforms. It's becoming a practice that eventually will be supported by some tool that Ton wants: Would there be a way to create a search agent that takes the name of a person you've met? Ideally you would provide such a search agent with your own account data of all the environments you are part of that you want to have searched. And then it comes back with a number of likely search results that might contain any or all of the following for instance:I have a very mixed feelings about it, similar to those in the comment by Marc Canter: Clearly their is a need for such a search function, but it steps right onto the issue of privacy and security on the web. For me, as someone who wants to 'bookmark' digital bits of people I met offline, having a tool like that would be great. For me, as a one 'being searched for', it sounds like a nightmare: I'm not happy when others connect my online dots on one page, especially if I don't know them. For me leaving my bits online is a conscious choice, but leaving them disintegrated 'all over the place' is a consious choice as well: if I make choices to share specific things in specific contexts and not put all on the same page I have a reasons to do so. And I'd like those reasons to be respected by whatever search tools (as they currently supposed to respect NOINDEX and NOFOLLOW of web-pages). At the end I want to have at least some rights over my own bits (e.g. digital traces not being aggregated without explicit content)... So, coming back to Ton's problem - one of the options that I could imagine is 'Plaze-based' search, an advanced version of something I experienced at SHiFT:
Of course, this is yet another centralised system (with all the problems of that), but at least it does a few things:
So, two questions regarding all these:
More on: knowledge mapping privacy
|
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||