Updated: 10/3/2006; 9:55:59 AM.

Mathemagenic


on personal productivity in knowledge-intensive environments, weblog research, knowledge management, PhD, serendipity and lack of work-life balance...
If you search for mathemagenic that has nothing to do with weblogs try this
    


Earlier | Home | Later

  Monday, September 04, 2006


  My definitions of a weblog

Last Friday Stephanie emailed a simple question, asking for my own definition of what a weblog is. I was too busy then, finishing things before a weekend offline (end-of-the-season windy North Sea coast, if you are curious ;), so I had to leave it till now. Of course, the purity of the experiment has been already spoiled since I have read about the first results, but I'll give it a try.

So, what is my definition of a weblog? I couldn't answer it easily because "it depends" - I could identify at least three clarifying questions that would probably result in different definitions (as I write this I don't know yet ;).

What is my weblog for me?

On my About page I say that it's my learning diary and it's "a reverse-order posting of insights, commentaries, links and a few longer stories". It's definitely more than that:

  • it's an edge between personal and social, between implicit and explicit, between themes, topics and people that otherwise would exist in parallel universes
  • it's an incubator - where ideas and relationships grow
  • it's my personal space online - pretty much like my home - where it's up to me to choose style and focus (or no style and focus); as with my home, I'm aware of others - they could peak through the windows or share a food and a conversation - so their (possible) presence definitely shapes what and how I write, but I still feel pretty much "owning" the place to cater for the guests only when I feel like doing it
  • it's a place for serendipitious conversations with myself and others - not expected, planned or counted on, but ever present as an opportunity

How do I know that it's a weblog when I see one?

First I react to the format (something I would probably recognise even if it's written in Chineese) - dated entries, reverse-chronological order, often a calendar and a way to peak into the archives (= bits of micropieces unfolding in time). However, this is not enought: one can well use a weblog software to update news pages of a website.

Second reaction is to the content and style: it should have some kind of "personal touch" to qualify as a weblog. Most likely it's writing from a first position (I, not academic we), personal stories, opinions - something subjective that shows the personality behind the text (as the opposite "trying to stay objective" of academic or journalistic writing). To be percieved as a weblog it needs some degree of "this is how I see the world" perspective in it.

Third thing is more complicated - I'd call it "a possibility for an interaction". To be a weblog it has to be not private, not "intended for myself only" - those I would percieve as personal diaries or private communication that in a strange way ended up in public. It also has to avoid another extreme - being written for an audience in a way that expects interaction and doens't make any sense without it (those give me suspicious feeling  of "something else pretending to be a weblog"). For me a weblog needs some degree of ambiguity ("not entirely for myself, not entirely for my readers") - something that gives an excuse to the author to actually write in public and to a reader to read it and an opportunity for both of them to interact without feeling an obligation to do so.

How do I define weblogs for my research?

This is totally different discussion, since my personal definitions above are a bit fuzzy to serve as a good criteria for deciding if something published online with a weblog software is actually a weblog. In my publications so far I usually refer to Jill's definition as a starting point and a self-definition ("if an author considers it a blog") in a process of data-collection. Since I'm into heavily qualitative sub-culture specific studies this works, but I definitely would be very cautious in using it with respects to "blogs in general".

I'm not happy with that: I'm pretty much sure that implicitly my research is shaped by my personal definition of what a weblog is, but I don't have (so far) a good way to articulate the criteria that would turn it into a some kind of "objective" researcher-independent definition.

And, Stephanie, a word of caution - "blogging" as an activity might be defined quite different from "writing a weblog" (for me it would be something like "doing things around my weblog" that would involve, for example, talking about my weblog with blogger friends when we meet).


Earlier | Home | Later


© Copyright 2002-2006 Lilia Efimova.

This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.

 
September 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Aug   Oct






Edublog award 2004 as Best Research Based Blog. Click for more details...


Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog. Please, make sure that I recognise your name or you have a nice autorisation message - I tend to decline calls from people I don't know ;)

Locations of visitors to this page Technorati Profile