13:51 11/06/2004
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
Mathemagenic
|
|
This time in Moscow was different - next to all other things I was running a kick-off meeting for a project (will tell more later - when marketing stuff is out :) with several European and Russian partners. For many Europeans it was the first experience in Russia - signtseeing, but also learning about the culture and preparing for the joint work. I wonder if I was annoying with all my questions about their experiences :) I was so curious to know what did they discover, find different, similar, worth attention... Even with open borders Russia is still pretty much unknown for many foreigners: image of Russia is a strange combination of cold war time impressions and stories in the media magnify specific issues, but do not tell much about everyday life. I'm happy that this trip made it a bit different at least for a few people. What I found interesting (and - in retrospect - it shouldn't be that surprising) that most learning about culture came through experiencing it - finding a way around the city and, especially, three days of joint work with Russian people (like a discussion on financial issues of the project that illuminated many issues that Russian businesses are facing). I was there with two colleagues, and, inspite of all my attempts to prepare them by telling stories it feels like my stories were nothing compared to the richness of their own experiences even in a limited number of situations. We didn't design on purpose for those experiences, but, given my believe that understanding cultures - similarities and differences - is crusial for this project, I really would like to think how to make "learning about culture through experience" element stronger next times. I also think about this from an ethnographic perspective - I've read too much about learning culture through reflecting on moments where you as an outsider do not fit. What is strange and funny is my own role - I was constantly switching between being Russian, being someone living abroad and being someone in between - understanding both sides, trying to mediate for common language, thinking of mediation process... This in-between position shows me a way to redefine my own identity and go beyond my current dichotomy of being a guest in the Netherlands or being a stranger in Russia. And - in case you are curious - main impressions of our European guests (my biased summary ;)
More on: cross-cultural ethnography facilitation RUSMECO Russia
|
|
Riccardo redefines social pressure: We are used to think of Social Pressure as that feeling of "I have to do more" to stand up with the expectations of others. Fortunately, there are no reasons to worry - I'm back :) I was in Moscow during the outage, but spent the whole day at a workshop in the Northern part of the city that went unaffected (although the high temperatures were raising even more with hearing the news). And - to be fair - I was pretty happy that for the last few days there I moved from my sister's appartment in the South to my parents' place - she told me her story of dark shops, people storming busses or giving up and walking along the street. Anyway - I'm more or less back (travelling a bit more for a few coming days). And I loved how Riccardo puts it concluding the post: Anyway, the point is that having a large social network actually imposes an higher attention degree on what goes on worldwide, and in a sense can make you listen to and be sympathethic with topics you'd never noticed before. This is pretty logical, but still feels strange - your main focus is still more or less on things you do and people around you, but your peripheral vision extends to far away world... More on: blog networking blog reading Russia
|
I think that it's hard to be interdisciplinary. I think everyone *wants* to be interdisciplinary but that seems to mean draw haphazardly from different disciplines, throw into the blender, add a few spices and voila interdisciplinary gazpacho. I want a chemical reaction dammit. Thinking of identity crising and staying in-between... Wondering what is necessary for the chemical reaction... More on: metaphors
|
|
There are hundred reasons to blog and quite some half-written posts in my head, but no time - I'm flying to Moscow on Saturday, so it's a lot to sort out before that. This trip will be special, both personally and professionally - wondering how things will go... It's also 4,5 months since my last visit - unbearably long comparing to the last couple of years (and - still - I know how lucky I'm to be able to fly frequently). I'm counting days: today - tomorrow - flying - home... Anyway, if you happen to be in Moscow and feel like cappuccino and wandering around - let me know Back to work... |
|
Last few days I spent more time than usual in front of the TV - watching Second World War stories, remembrance and celebrations. It feels strange - being surrounded by "other" views and ways than those that I grew up with. In Russia it's celebrated today - 9 May - as a Victory Day. I remember it colorful - colorful parades, colorful medals, colorful flowers. I learnt the war - and Victory - stories as I grew up, picking up from adults, from official propaganda, from school, but, most importantly from stories in my family. Especially from the story of my grandparents, carrying their love through the war. Somehow the knowledge about millions who died, fights and suffering was always there, but it was always taken over by the feeling of Victory, the colors that come over black... Now it's different. Watching Remembrance Day ceremony over Dutch TV was definitely moving, but also a bit depressing - in grey and black - so much contrast with what I knew as the end of the war memory - colorful and full of hope... That was just learning about the differences... More difficult part came yesterday, in special program on National Geographic... I didn't get the title and googling didn't work, but anyway, the way it was done was really nice. They recorded and reconstructed stories of several people as they went through the last days of war - those of different nationalities, different sides, soldiers and civilians. It was a great learning experience - the history reconstructed from different perspectives - but I couldn't avoid a bitter feeling. The way it was presented was totally different from what I've learnt in school. Not very surprising, since the dark moments of Soviet history were not new to me... The bitterness came from something what I believe is downplaying the role of Soviet army in that war. Soviets (which, of course, equals Russians for whatever reasons) were portrayed as those that the whole Europe was scared of and had to be protected from. Americans and British were those who saved so many countries from "another dictatorship"... I do not want to insist on one perspective, especially the one I've learnt at school. I'm happy that I have an opportunity to learn the history as it is Even CNN coverage of celebrations in Moscow today was more balanced... I guess I'll never know the truth - what happened during that war and who really won. History seems to be so easily rewritten... |
|
I was a bit mixed up after finding out that I was being researched by students as part of their assignment. Not because I'm uncomfortable with it. I'm pretty aware that my weblog is "out there" for others to study, I participated in a few weblog studies as a "case" and I'm always glad to "return" the favor even if it's not directly to those whom I study. Being uncomfortable comes from a feeling of intrusion into a private space - the girls researching me didn't expect me to start studying them in turn. "Intrusion discomfort" came not so much from doing background search work (at the end what I found was published openly on the web), but from letting them know that I found them when I blogged it. I thought that they would be uncomfortable knowing that they are being watched, so I became uncomfortable myself thinking of that :) I found kind of a middle ground. I didn't blog any direct links and names, so at least their work didn't get exposed to more people (don't think others had many reasons to get curious enough about the issue to do the same background connections I did). And I didn't look in the wiki pages about myself untill reading today in weblog of one of the authors that the assignment was finished. And, yes, somehow I didn't have any problem subscribing to weblogs of both students. The reason I'm writing about this that it's unusual. Usually I wouldn't have any problem linking to most of weblogs/wiki pages I find online, even if they are about myself. So, I wonder why I'm different this time... It's definitely has some connection with blog research ethics, or, probably just with blog ethics. Something around: "don't bring into a spotlight those who think they are in a private space if you think they may not like it". Another reason is that it was an assignment in a course. I didn't want to mess up whatever goals Adrian has for the assignment and I didn't want to make it too complicated for the students. Anyway, I'm wondering what Adrian Miles and the students would say: did I do more harm or good with putting my nose into this whole thing? could I take more freedom and link directly to students and their work? can I do it now when it's finished? As for me that was a nice experience:
And this is one more illustration why I find mixing blogging and research so fun and so rewarding :) |
|
Was writing email answering questions about blogging and realised that I often do a trick. When I write about my own experiences I often start with I ("I blog because it's fun"), but somehow in between I switch to talking about you ("when you start blogging you often discover how fun it is"). So, a bit of wondering:
More on: blog writing
|
© Copyright 2002-2006 Lilia Efimova ![]()
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
Last update: 1/19/2006; 9:35:22 PM.