13:51 11/06/2004
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
Mathemagenic
|
|
More on: infoOverload
|
|
You know that you are turning into a blog research addict if you discuss coding of weblogs with Lois and Elijah in a dream and then wake up to share breakfast with your partner in crime of mapping weblog communities :) Stephanie is here and it's a lot of fun... More on: blog research
|
|
Others are writing on blogging and research too :) More on: blogging as research
|
|
So, I'm going to Social Computing Symposium 2005. This means that I'm travelling to US again (after Hawaii/Minneapolis/Chicago in January). So far the plan is to be in Seattle during the last week of April (~23-30), but...
So I'm thinking what to do... Flying back and forth will be stupid, but not sure I can afford spending 3 weeks out of work. Anyway, this is a luxury problem :) If you are in Seattle that week let me know. More on: learning event travel
|
|
A slightly edited/linked piece from my proposal for Microsoft Research Social Computing Symposium 2005 (and I'm very excited to be invited :) I have been planning to write a proper weblog post around bullet points at the end, but it's not happenning fast, so I just post it as it is and come back to it later. Although weblogs are perceived as low-threshold tools to publish on-line, empowering individual expression in public, there is growing evidence of social structures evolving around weblogs and their influence on norms and practices of blogging. This evidence ranges from voices of bloggers themselves speaking about the social effects of blogging, to studies on specific weblog communities with distinct cultures (e.g. knitting community or goth community), to mathematical analysis of links between weblogs indicating that community formation in the blogosphere is not a random process, but an indication of shared interests binding bloggers together (Kumar, Novak, Raghaven, & Tomkins, 2003).
Social structures emerging around weblogs are interesting for a number of reasons. Weblogs provide spaces for both individual expression and control, and interactions within social ecosystem; hence providing insights of interplays between practices of networked individuals (Wellman, 2002, .pdf) and social structures where those individuals belong. While some weblog communities mirror existing social structures, others emerge when strangers find each other and connect. Weblogs do not provide a shared space with central topic or activity to be attracted to, nor (often) pre-existing community, but do support emergent social connections. The nature of those connections is especially interesting, since understanding them can help to design environments to support emergence of social structures without predefining their focus or membership. From this perspective blogging is similar to "life between buildings" in a real city that "an opportunity to be with others in a relaxed and undemanding way". This quote comes from architect Jan Gehl (2001) who discusses how to design public spaces that welcome and support social life. While reading Gehl's work I couldn't avoid associations with insights about "individual in a public space" from my own research (I study uses and effects of blogging for personal knowledge management). I'd like to draw on parallels between real cities and the world of blogging and propose characteristics of a space that supports emergent social activities:
These characteristics could be illustrated with examples from other social software applications (del.icio.us, Flickr, etc.) next to weblogs, so I guess they provide a good start for a discussion. More on: articulation blog communities city
|
|
And while I was searching for the right link for "It's just a matter of common sense: Ethnography as invisible work by Diana Forsythe to add to my story I came across A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work by Bonnie Nardi and Yrjö Engeström, which is an editorial for the "invisible work" issue of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Wonder how I could miss it - with all my interests in invisible work? More to read :) More on: ethnography papers transparency
|
|
It was inspired by reading a chapter in the handbook of qualitative research: Auto-ethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject by Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner. Reading it, day before yesteday, was a special journey and emotional experience, and somehow I had a need to write about it. Continue to the story: Two papers, me in between More on: blog research blogging as research papers
|
|
Yesterday I printed out 2004 archives of my weblog (if you need the same for whatever purpose the best way is to print monthly archives: they don't have any navigation bars, just text). It is surprising: not only the number of pages (329 pages in total - I could write draft of my dissertation ;), but the fact that there are many things I forgot I wrote and even more things that feel like distant past while they are only a year or so old. More on: blog writing
|
|
While looking for CFP for persistent conversations at HICSS 2006 I came across a draft chapter from Tom Erickson: Five Lenses: Towards a Toolkit for Interaction Design, which lays out five different perspectives to look at interaction (mind, proxemics, artifacts, the social, the ecological) and discusses multi-perspective approach in design. It's thoughtful and easy read, so you should do it yourself. The rest are my pickings: On artifacts (for those who want more references on artefacts and thinking :) Next we shift our view to the artifacts in the picture [Tom uses a photo of chessplay in a city squareto discuss five lenses]. We see a chessboard arrayed with white and black pieces; off to one side we see a cluster of captured black pieces, and off to the other a pair of chess clocks. These artifacts play a variety of roles, interacting with the views from other lenses. One role of artifacts, that Norman explores in Things that Make Us Smart (1993), is to ease the cognitive load: the board and the pattern of pieces on it serve to preserve the state of the game, enabling players to focus on planning their next moves. Another role of artifacts is their status as objects that are manipulated by the participants. While the manipulation of chess pieces is a relatively simple matter, ethnomethodologists like David Sudnow demonstrate that the ways in which people physically interact with objects is incredibly subtle. In his book, Ways of the Hand, Sudnow (2001) gives an exquisitely detailed account of the process of learning improvise jazz on the piano, and the ways in which his hands (not his mind) learned to traverse the keys. A third role of artifacts is depicted by Ed Hutchins in Cognition in the Wild (1995), in which he explores the view that cognition is not just a property of minds, but can be seen as a global property of systems of people and artifacts. A fourth role of artifacts is a social one, in that the pair of clocks substitute for a human time keeper. This view is explored by Bruno Latour (1992), who eloquently makes the case for a sociology of artifacts, suggesting that it is artifacts which stabilize and extend human interaction patterns. This lens--with the glimpses it gives of artifacts and their varied roles--is important for those who design material artifacts, as well as for those who aim to replace material objects with digital 'equivalents.' On the role of theory: [...] two roles of theory stand in tension to one another: the utility of a theory for promoting debate and further articulation of itself within a field may actually interfere with its utility in communicating beyond the field. The requirements for promoting articulation within a field involve supporting the creation of distinctions and nuances that can serve as the ground upon positions can be established, whereas the requirements for communicating beyond a field require the ability to depict the conceptual framework in a few bold and broad strokes of the brush. While the ability of a framework to support the finely detailed nuance is not necessarily at odds with the ability to also serve as a simplifying framework, it often is. This is pretty much the dilemma I have with my PKM model: I envision it as a tool for communication "between fields" and "beyond the field" which call for simplicity, but I'm not sure that this is something that would be "good enough" for the PhD. And, finally, the paper is one more sign that I should look at pattern language. More on: knowledge representations methodology papers PhD
|
|
Bill Ives puts it nicely: From an individual perspective blogs offer: I'd add a big picture (corporate or community perspective): aggregation, emergence of unexpected, tapping into invisible... |
|
Sometimes technology doesn't help and the only way to be there is to be there physically. Just called my best friend - she is having a party to celebrate her 30. In Moscow. More on: life
|
|
Just a quote. Profgrrrrl: Let's say I'm studying the development of a blog over time. I don't need to follow it while it is developing. Reading the archives later on yields just as much information. Ditto for studying, say, a court case. I'll just get the transcripts/records later on. (Nope, sorry. Misses all of the perceptual data that should be recorded in field notes. In the case of the blog, what if there were a controversial post that was up for 3 days and then deleted. Won't show in your archives. In the case of the court case, how will you know who was in the room, how they reacted, how long pauses were, etc.) See also: Archaeology and ethnography in weblog research This post also appears on channel weblog research More on: blog research methodology
|
|
So I'll just share one of my spring photos (no, this is not what I see from my window right now, this is Innsbruck beginning of April 2004). More on: life
|
|
Most of the time I love going multidisciplinary, but now it feels more as a curse. Books are piling up on my desk, I discover yet another theory, get reviewer comments with "so and so paper would be relevant here"... I guess it's not about information overload - the world is big regardless the size of window I use to look at it. It's about complexity - and a need to map, model, simplify, represent it in languages I know. Nobody teaches you to make sense (even Dave Snowden :) I just start somewhere. There should be a way to crack this jigsaw puzzle. Parallel track: AOK Star Series with Dave Snowden - Complexity: The Next Big Thing After KM and Dave's article on multi-ontology sense making (.pdf) More on: PhD
|
|
From today's workshop on information overload:
[I wanted to add more things, it's not working that way, so just posting from drafts] |
|
Stephanie is coming to NL: looking forward to the fun of f2f work and conversations about life... I do it myself, but again and again I'm getting amazed how online connections turn into booking plane tickets. More on: blog networking travel
|
|
blo.gs is for sale (via Luis) this includes: Having that database of blogs can make life of many weblog researchers much easier... Would be nice if Technorati or Bloglines or PubSub or any other weblog-indexing site could help... Not necessary with a copy of database, but at least a set of APIs that could do something like:
Of course, all these depends on definition of weblog one uses and lots of other things, but still... More on: blog research
|
|
Commenting on my quest about learning to do ethnographic research Andrea Handl pointed to Virtual ethnography book by Christine Hine. I did a bit of browsing and came across Virtual methods seminar (which is not active now, but good resource anyway). Between other things it has thematic guide that points to paper abstracts and presentations on:
More on: ethnography methodology
|
© Copyright 2002-2005 Lilia Efimova ![]()
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
Last update: 6/30/2005; 11:35:24 PM.