Updated: 6/30/2005; 11:30:56 PM.

Mathemagenic


...giving birth to learning...
If you search for mathemagenic that has nothing to do with weblogs try this
    


Earlier | Home | Later

  Thursday, April 29, 2004


  Weblog research ethics (2)

This is what I love about blogosphere: you post a question and keep being busy with other things while many smart people provide you with answers. Two days back I posted my questions on weblog research ethics that provoked quite a discussion.

The opinions regarding informing bloggers that you study them and asking permissions differ: Sylvie Noël suggests to do it anyway, while Alex Halavais regards weblogs as "the equivalent of public printed matter like newspaper articles, brochures, and books" (so I assume not asking).

In regard to quoting it's a bit more clear.

Sylvie in comments:

As to quoting, well, it would depend if I'm treating the blog as a source for data or a source for information: if I'm studying the blog, then I'd ask for permission to quote, giving the person possibility of being anonymous or attributed because of the possibility of tracing back to the original author. If I'm using the blog for information, then I consider it as the equivalent of a research paper and I would not ask for permission (but of course I'd attribute the quotes to the author).

Alex adds that this is about balancing two potential responsibilities to your subjects: to protect their privacy and to recognize the authorship of the individual. It seems that the bottom line is to attribute, asking permission if you treat a quote as a data.

And thanks to hafey (who is linkless, but could be identified as "just a plain olí MBA trying desperately not to see the world through business as usual constructs") I discover what Hawthorne Effect is :)

My further questions are triggered by Ed Bilodeau note that he is not likely to be citing weblogs as they are "not (yet?) valid supporting sources". I thought about it quote a lot - should you refer to weblogs as references in an academic publication?.

My problem is that my thinking is heavily influenced by bloggers. More than by any papers I read. I pick up phrases and ideas from weblogs around me and I feel it's not fair if I don't attribute them only because they are not considered as "serious" enough. But then it goes against existing academic tradition. I've heard some academics saying that even conference papers are not good enough to be cited in a journal paper (ok, I guess that wasn't about first class conferences).

If you add to it that there is not much weblog research published anyway (e.g. I'm not aware of any journal paper on weblogs; let me know if you are :) it becomes quite difficult... Of course, 2004 seems to become a year of "weblog research gets into mainstream publications", so I shouldn't have this problem at the end of my PhD, but still.

Ah, I'm getting convinced more and more that I'm not well fitted for academia. Not the part that explores the world in a rigorous way, but the one with rules for publication and promotion that just don't make a sense to me :)

This post also appears on channel weblog research


  The web is about changing people's attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors

Ross Mayfield points to Captology Notebook, a weblog of Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. Between others things there: books about persuasion and a quote by BJ Fogg:

The web is not about sharing information with people -- that's an illusion. In reality, the web is about changing people's attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.

See also: Captology, persuasive technologies and web credibility


A bit of later: associated with thinking about persuasion - How I was played by Online Caroline, Jill's essay featured at her homepage.

Emanuel Vigeland is the little-known younger brother of the famous Norwegian sculptor Gustav Vigeland. While Gustav filled a huge park with sculptures, creating a monumental Oslo tourist attraction that still bears his name, Emanuel spent decades designing and building his own mausoleum. He designed the space to direct visitors' movements in several ways. The door is so low that I have to bow my head to enter. Inside the light is dim, and it takes several minutes for my eyes to adjust. The acoustics are peculiar, making my slightest sound reverberate in echos. I walk quietly to avoid making a din. The architecture makes it physically impossible to enter or view his work without showing it respect (Wadell 41-42).


Earlier | Home | Later


© Copyright 2002-2005 Lilia Efimova.

This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.

 
April 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Mar   May






Edublog award 2004 as Best Research Based Blog. Click for more details...


Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog. Please, make sure that I recognise your name or you have a nice autorisation message - I tend to decline calls from people I don't know ;)

Locations of visitors to this page