|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A bit more knowledge networker thinking for my PhD research (I'm looking at weblogs as a case to understand knowledge workers). I distingush between three directions of weblog use by knowledge workers (slightly different earlier version with more details):
This makes me thinking that it may be more useful to consider knowledge work not as creating-learning-sharing-applying knowledge, but as system of activities in three interrelated spaces:
More on: knowledge networker PhD
|
|
As I promised: recently online about knowledge workers. "CIO knowledge worker" series by Davenport:
Jim McGee's letter commenting on Davenport - Knowledge Workers Should Watch Themselves (thanks to Jack Vinson): knowledge work can not be automated and knowledge workers are only those who can judge the quality of it Dave Pollard posts a paper about The future of knowledge managament with practical suggestions for improving knowledge worker productivity. More on: knowledge networker
|
|
I guess I'm part of the broader KM trend: writing about knowledge worker productivity :) I wrote a story, Knowledge worker paradox, where I try to explain why "When it comes to knowledge workers, we pretty much hire smart people and leave them alone" (Davenport). One sentence summary: organisations focus on things they can control and can measure, thus knowledge work is left to knowledge workers. Please note:
More on: knowledge networker PhD
|
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||