I’m not writing because I’m analysing 82 responses to my questionnaires. I didn’t expected so many, my initial analysis strategy is not applicable any more, I’m trying to find out how to deal with the data overflow, but I’m really happy that I didn’t go for multiple-choice questions about motivation because a lot of interesting things emerge from the answers… Just teasing, I’ll work on it tomorrow and post more :)
So, the plan is:
- go through the aggregated answers for open questions, spot patterns, post “raw data” and initial interpretations on-line;
- finish calculations of quantitative answers per each blogger/”would be blogger” category (I have five of them), spot any differences, post on-line;
- go thought initial interpretations, decide about grouping and extra analysis;
- write draft – post on-line – revise – ready.
The funny thing is that after my first looks at the data I’m not sure that I will find a difference between “bloggers” and “would be bloggers”. Although I feel that several interesting things are emerging…
Tags: BlogTalk paperArchived version of this entry is available at http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2003/04/24.html#a562; comments are here.
Related posts