| Updated: 6/23/2005; 11:49:44 AM. |
 |
 |
 |
Mathemagenic...giving birth to learning... |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Why Content Management Software Hasn't Worked
Why Content Management Software Hasn't Worked. The same could be said of the LCMS industry: "Content management software hasn't worked because it was badly designed and massively over-hyped. Software companies lied about their products, charging criminal prices for crap software. It hasn't worked because organizations didn't understand content. They wanted a quick fix. They issued specifications that bore little relation to what they actually needed." By Gerry McGovern, New Thinking, March 3, 2003 [Refer][Research][Reflect] More on: failures
|
|
New blog: Real KM
New blog Real KM by "Luigi" Lugmayr points to Blogs from Microsoft Employees. Two new site to notice :)
More on: blog new
|
|
Transdisciplinarity in KM
Recent comments to “Emergent KM Research” – proposal from Quaerere to KAngels continue the discussion about multi-/trans-/inter-disciplinary approaches to KM. At this stage reading the discussion can make you totally confusing, so to pieces: Definition of transdisciplinarity (cited by Peter Troxler from Transdisciplinarity - New Structures in Science) a scientific (...) principle that is active wherever a definition of problems and their solutions is not possible within a given field or discipline. I also want to reiterate my question: is there anyone seriously interested in methodological issues of KM? Please let me know. More on: research
|
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
   |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
