|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One more from paper hunting search: Social Network References (Academic Bibliography) More on: reading social network mapping
|
|
Trying to find a paper on-line gives you a lot of other interesting things. So, I came accross public papers of IBM Watson Research Center. These are some I'd like to check out:
More on: communities learning reading
|
|
Denham Grey comments on Matching?: Blogging for money, love, attention and branding misses the sweet spot IMO. I agree that best blogs I read are written "in the true spirit of knowledge sharing", do it's not very likely that blogs with main goals of making money woud catch a lot of attention. But what's wrong with branding or money as a side effect? Blogging is not pushing, but giving others an opportunity to pull and make their choices. Terry Frazier adds (see comments to this post): More importantly, blogging is painfully transparent and self-limiting in regard to how self-serving it can be. A few short posts can reveal the underlying approach of the author. Those who fail to add value are unlikely to gain a helpful brand, love, or anything else they seek. More on: blogging etiquette
|
This weblog is my learning diary. Sometimes I write about things related to my work, but the views expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||